Welcome to the Rethinking Schools Archives and Website

Become a subscriber or online account holder to read this article and hundreds more. Learn more.
Already a subscriber or account holder? Log in here.

Preview of Article:

Dangers of Early Childhood Testing

Dangers          of Early Childhood Testing

By Bob Peterson

In 1987 the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) adopted a policy opposing testing of kindergarten through second-grade children ages three through eight. The NAEYC's position lists multiple cautions and points out, "Young children are not good test takers. The younger the child, the more inappropriate paper-and-pencil, large-group test administrations become."

According to Kathy Lake, Dean of Education at Milwaukee's Alverno College, some of the other professional organizations opposed to standardized testing for young children include: the National Council of Teachers of English, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, and the National Association of Elementary School Principals.

Mary Diez, Graduate Dean at Alverno College and a national expert on student assessment, told Rethinking Schools that she strongly opposes the MPS plan of testing first-and second-graders. "Everything we know about testing says that such testing is neither valid nor reliable on kids younger than third grade. Besides, it causes trauma and it's just unnecessary."

Vito Peronne, Director of Programs in Teacher Education at Harvard Graduate School of Education, has argued that continuing testing in the early grades "in the face of so much evidence of its deleterious effects, in opposition to most of what we know about the developmental needs of young children, is the height of irresponsibility."

To Read the Rest of This Article:

Become a subscriber or online account holder to read this article and hundreds more. Learn more.
Already a subscriber or account holder? Log in here.