Welcome to the Rethinking Schools Archives and Website
Become a subscriber or online account holder to read this article and hundreds more. Learn more.Already a subscriber or account holder? Log in here.
Preview of Article:
Transparency of Water
A workshop on math, water, and justice
Purchase a PDF of this article
Martha Merson
If you are an environmental organizer, like Selene, your classroom is a conference room, the community garden, or a church parking lot. Your students are everyone—from toddlers to the elderly; they come with a variety of levels of formal education.Your goal is to increase environmental justice, community well-being, and individuals' health.
If you are a math educator/curriculum writer with an interest in data, like Martha, you teach in adult ed and K–12 classrooms, libraries, and living rooms—anywhere you can sneak in math. The teaching starts with a provocative statistic or a document with unfathomable numbers. Your students are often math averse. Their motivation could be to earn a high school diploma or simply to learn more. Many have plans to put learning to use in their communities, churches, and families. Your goal is to encourage adults and youth to take a new look at numbers, to ask questions.
Statistics for Action (SfA) brought us together. SfA provides organizers and community members with tools and resources for understanding and using scientific data in communities affected by environmental contamination. During the project, we led an SfA-inspired workshop in Spanish designed to probe participants' distrust of tap water and arm them with skills and knowledge to take on water quality/delivery issues.
Do You Drink Chicago's Tap Water?
We made coffee and set up a water taste test. At 9 a.m., volunteers recruited for a six-week leadership program filed in for their 4th session. Among the participants were Carmela, a single mother, college student, and intern at Little Village Environmental Justice Organization; Elena, who is studying for a commercial trucker's license; and two middle school students, Luna and Maria, who brought along their pet rooster. The eight participants ranged in age from 10 to 60. Their project facilitator, Norma, also a neighborhood resident, has a long history of social justice work.
We began a taste test of Mountain Spring bottled water, filtered water, and tap water. Selene instructed the participants to sample water from each of three pitchers. They examined the water in their cups, swished it around, and swallowed.
Carmela: “This is good because I'm dehydrated.”
Sandra: “I'm a dummy; they taste the same to me.”
Carmela: “It's all the same water, I get it.” She laughs, then: “Is it?”
Elena: “It's between A and B.”
Although divided in their prefer ences, most surprising to them was their difficulty in discriminating between bottled and tap water.
Martha then asked: “Do you buy bottled water?”
We wanted to understand why and to what extent the participants paid for bottled water. We hoped that some of their reasons would be examined in The Story of Bottled Water (storyofstuff.org), which we had queued up.
Yoana: “I buy bottled water because it's cleaner.”
Carmela related what happened when her girlfriend offered her water: “I'm like, ‘What are you doing?' because that's tap water—forget about it. [But] the tap water tasted better and I would tell my mama, ‘Drink water from the tap, it tastes very good,' and she would say to me ‘No! Are you crazy? It has chemicals.'”
We didn't judge participants' choices. Distrust of tap water can run deep in communities of color. Little Village, the Chicago neighborhood where the participants live, is home to more than 90,000 residents, nearly half of whom are immigrants, according to the University of Chicago. Many come from places with a history of serious water issues. In a 2011 study published in Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, of the parents surveyed, “Minority parents were more likely to exclusively give bottled water to their children.” Reasons cited included taste and safety.1
In 2008 the Environmental Working Group published results of their investigation of 10 popular brands of bottled water in nine states and found a total of “38 chemical pollutants . . . with an average of eight contaminants in each brand,” including industrial solvents and fertilizer residue.2 Consequently, the reliance on bottled water in communities of color is a serious concern. In addition to the ecological and economic issues related to bottled water use, these communities are disproportionately at risk for health consequences associated with bottled water.
To Read the Rest of This Article:
Become a subscriber or online account holder to read this article and hundreds more. Learn more.Already a subscriber or account holder? Log in here.