Home > Archives > Volume 26 No.1 - Fall 2011 > GOOD STUFF • Keywords

GOOD STUFF • Keywords

Subscribe Online & Save Current issue pdf just $4.95. Subscribe

CONTENTS
Vol. 26, No.1


COVER STORIES • Still Fighting for All Our Children

Blowin' in the Wind

By the editors of Rethinking Schools

The Birth of Rethinking Schools
By Bob Peterson

Rethinking Schools and the Power of Silver
By Christine Sleeter


FEATURES


For or Against Children?
The Problematic History of Stand for Children
By Ken Libby and Adam Sanchez

Trigger Laws: Does Signing a Petition Give Parents a Voice?
By David Bacon

Patterns and Punctuation
Learning to Question Language
By Elizabeth Schlessman

‘Before Today, I Was Afraid of Trees’
Rethinking Nature Deficit Disorder
By Doug Larkin

Why the Best Kids’ Books Are Written in Blood
By Sherman Alexie

What Do You Mean When You Say Urban?
Speaking Honestly About Race and Students
By Dyan Watson

It’s OK to Be Neither
Teaching That Supports Gender-Variant Children
By Melissa Bollow Tempel

The New Model of Teacher Evaluation: How Would Ms. Frizzle Fare?
By Marni Barron and Leigh Dingerson


COLUMNS and DEPARTMENTS


A LETTER TO OUR READERS

LETTERS TO THE EDITORS

ACTION EDUCATION 
SOS March Builds Pushback to Corporate Reform
By Stan Karp

GOOD STUFF
Keywords
By Herb Kohl

RESOURCES


Got an idea for an article? Got an idea for a letter? Contact Jody Sokolower, policy and publications editor:
jody@rethinkingschools.org

 

Fall 2011

By Herbert KohlAdd to Cart button Purchase a PDF of this article

Keywords 
By Raymond Williams
(Oxford University Press, 1985)

Keywords for Children’s Literature
Edited by Phillip Nel and Lissa Paul
(NYU Press, 2011)

The writing and content of Rethinking Schools is 25 years young, fresh, and honest—no small challenge at a time when language has become increasingly debased by sophisticated linguistic manipulation in the service of controlling children’s behavior, dismantling public education, and demeaning the high calling of teaching in public schools.

Words matter, and the manipulation of thought through language is one of the dangers we have to confront in the current media world. However, you have to fight words with the same words. To make multiculturalism an evil (for example, in the Norwegian context), or to demonize the words “liberal” or “socialist” in popular discourse, or to elevate words like “standards,” “evaluation,” and “accountability” to sacred status is to use language in the service of particular ideologies. This, of course, is nothing new, but the stealing and twisting of meaning by the right has never been so clever and cynical.

As an asthmatic, I know what it is like to have your breath taken away and how powerless it can sometimes make you feel. The strategy of stealing the language of progressives has had a major effect on educational conversation. The frustrations faced by people like Diane Ravitch and Debbie Meier, by the editors of Rethinking Schools, and by all of us who are committed to protect and nurture public education, is manifested in our loss of a persuasive language to change the conversation. We argue about choice, vouchers, tenure, unions, evaluation, charters, etc. from defensive positions. Instead of having a refreshing and inspiring new language of creative education, we have ended up just fighting back.

I don’t have a program for changing all of this, but as usual find myself going back to the sources of the use, politics, and pedagogy of language.

Recently I have found myself returning to Raymond Williams’ classic Keywords. Keywords are familiar, often-used words that are charged with ideas and associations. When examined critically and historically, they can reveal prejudices, ideology, social and cultural assumptions, and the use of language to manipulate how people think and act.

In a recent edition, Williams examines 175 words and concepts, including: country, culture, private, sex, generation, equality, empirical, democracy, determine, consensus, realism, revolution, management, socialist, ecology, development, science, organic, ordinary, elite, and dialectic. His analyses reveal the history of the words and their current political and social use. I think every educator should have a copy of this book on his or her reference shelf.

Keywords for Children’s Literature is explicitly designed to relate Williams’ structures to current children’s literature. It examines, in essays written by distinguished educators, such keywords as: African American, character, childhood, class, classic, education, crossover literature, fantasy, gender, graphic novel, ideology, intention, Latino, multicultural, marketing, queer, science fiction, tomboy, voice, race, and picture book. The essays are fascinating and insightful, though for my tastes sometimes a bit overly academic. I think it is definitely worth putting on the shelf next to Williams’ book.

A final thought and suggestion for an exercise: If you have a collection of Rethinking Schools (or check the archive), examine how the uses of these keywords have morphed over 25 years. Use the exercise as a way of refreshing our memories and our language.


Herbert Kohl’s most recent book is The Herb Kohl Reader.