Rethinking Schools Online
Order   Who Are You
Current Issue Article Index Archives Web Resources Publications Just For Fun
Home > Archives > Volume 20 No. 4 - Summer 2006 > Teacher Resistance in the United Kingdom

Teacher Resistance in the United Kingdom

Summer 2006

By Nick Grant

The testing regime Melissa Schieble so accurately captures was opposed by teacher unions at its outset — but only in terms of workload, not in terms of pedagogy or the removal of professional choice that it has brought. So once Margaret Thatcher's government conceded that external markers would grade the national Standard Assessment Tests (SATs), union opposition fell away.

Since then, the tyranny of the national tests has undeniably damaged teaching and learning. This prompted a ballot to boycott the national tests by members of the National Union of Teachers in primary schools in late 2003 — this time in a direct political rather than workplace confrontation.

Sadly, our ballot was insufficient according to internal union rules, though it met legal minimal requirements of participation and consent. Those who voted were almost unanimously in favor, but around 70 percent abstained. An "Anti-SATs Alliance" of educators and parents had not won the case. Bullying principals were a large factor in the abstention rate.

But we now have a surprising yet very welcome development. The National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT), organizing almost all primary sector and many secondary sector school principals, has called on parents to boycott next year's SATs by keeping their kids at home for the mornings in May that they are to be taken.

NAHT is being careful because as SATs are statutory, refusal to administer them is technically a crime.

NAHT leader Mick Brookes said, "League tables [media rankings of schools based on government test data] just demoralize schools every year. When schools have been working hard to raise standards, it demoralizes them when they are down at the bottom of the league tables."

Let's hope teachers, principals, parents, and students can unite to rid us of these tests in 2007. Melissa Scheible — and others — watch this space!

Nick Grant is co-founder of Rethinking Education (www.rethinkinged.org.uk) and a branch secretary for the National Union of Teachers in Ealing, West London.

Summer 2006

CONTENTS
Vol. 20, No. 4

Special Focus: The Politics of Food and Schools

Feeding the children

Feeding Our Future

Don't Bite the Hand That Feeds

Fossil Food: Consuming Our Future

There's No Business Like Food Business

Home Cooking

Sowing Seeds of Solidarity

Linking the Land with the Lunchroom

'Yuck! Worms Are Disgusting!'

Hunger on Trial

Lessons from Ana

Soda Contracts: Who Really Benefits?

Healthy Bodies, Healthy Minds

Got a Little More Than Milk?

Good Stuff: On Eating

Reviews: Videos with a Conscience

Book Reviews: Grub: Ideas for an Urban Organic Kitchen


A Dark Cloud on the U.S. Horizon

Promises, Promises

Children's Literature Spotlight

Immigration Action


COLUMNS AND DEPARTMENTS


Letters

Strange Stuff

Short Stuff

Good Stuff

Resources