Rethinking Schools Online
Order   Who Are You
Current Issue Article Index Archives Web Resources Publications Just For Fun
Home > Archives > Volume 16 No. 4- Summer 2002 > Membership Has Its Privileges

Membership Has Its Privileges

Race is not just a Black or Latino issue, but also a white issue. How can whites acknowledge and challenge the privileges that go with whiteness?

By Tim Wise

Being white means never having to think about it. James Baldwin said that many years ago, and it's perhaps the truest thing ever said about race in America. That's why I get looks of bewilderment whenever I ask, as I do when lecturing to a mostly white audience: "What do you like about being white?" Never having contemplated the question, folks take a while to come up with anything.

We're used to talking about race as a Black issue, or Latino, Asian or Native American problem. We're used to books written about "them," but few that analyze what it means to be white in this culture. Statistics tell of the disadvantages of "blackness" or "brownness" but few examine the flipside: namely, the advantages whites receive as a result.

That which keeps people of color off balance in a racist society is that which keeps whites in control - a truism that must be discussed if whites are to understand our responsibility to work for change. Each thing "they" have to contend with as they navigate the waters of American life is one less thing whites have to sweat, and that makes everything easier, from finding jobs, to getting loans, to attending college.

On a personal level, it has been made clear to me repeatedly. Like the time I attended a party in a white suburb and one of the few Black men there announced he had to leave before midnight, fearing his trip home - which required that he travel through all-white neighborhoods - would likely result in being pulled over by police, who would wonder what he was doing out so late in the "wrong" part of town.

He would have to be cognizant - in a way I would not - of every lane change, every blinker he did or didn't remember to use, whether his lights were too bright, or too dim, and whether he was going even five miles an hour over the limit, as any of those could serve as pretexts for pulling him over.

WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

The virtual invisibility that whiteness affords those of us who have it is like psychological money in the bank, the proceeds of which we cash in every day while others are in a state of perpetual overdraft.

Yet, it isn't enough to see these things, or think about them, or come to appreciate what whiteness means; though important, this enlightenment is no end in itself. Rather, it is what we do with the knowledge and understanding that matters.

As to why we should want to end racial privilege - aside from the moral argument - the answer is straightforward: the price we pay to stay one step ahead of others is enormous. In the labor market, we benefit from racial discrimination in the relative sense, but in absolute terms this discrimination holds down most of our wages and living standards by keeping working people divided and creating a surplus labor pool of "others" to whom employers can turn when the labor market gets tight or workers demand too much in wages or benefits.

And even disparate treatment in the justice system has its blowback on the white community. We may think little of the racist growth of the prison-industrial complex, as it snares far fewer of our children. But considering that the prisons warehousing Black and Brown bodies compete for the same dollars needed to build colleges for everyone, the impact is far from negligible.

In California, since 1980, nearly 30 new prisons have opened, compared to two four-year colleges. So folks fight over the pieces of a diminishing pie - as with Proposition 209 to end affirmative action - instead of uniting against their common problem: the mostly white lawmakers who build jails and slash taxes on the wealthy instead of meeting the needs of most people.

As for how whites can challenge the system - other than by joining the occasional demonstration or voting for candidates with a decent record on race issues - this is where we'll need creativity.

Imagine, for example, that groups of whites and people of color started going to local department stores as discrimination "tester" teams. And imagine the whites spent a few hours, in shifts, observing how they were treated relative to the black and brown folks who came with them. And imagine what would happen if every white person on the team approached a different white clerk and returned just-purchased merchandise, if and when they observed disparate treatment, explaining they weren't going to shop in a store that profiled or otherwise racially discriminated. Imagine the faces of the clerks, confronted by other whites demanding equal treatment for persons of color.

Far from insignificant, if this happens often enough, it could have a serious effect on behavior and the institutional mistreatment of people of color in at least this one setting-after all, white clerks could no longer be sure if the white shopper in ladies' lingerie was an ally who would wink at unequal treatment, or whether they might be one of "those" whites: the kind that would call them out for doing what they always assumed was acceptable.

Or what about setting up "cop watch" programs like those already in place in a few cities? White folks, following police, filming officer's interactions with people of color, and making their presence known when and if they observe officers engaged in abusive behavior.

SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS

Or contingents of white parents could speak out in school board meetings against racial tracking in class assignments, a process where kids of color are much more likely to be placed in basic classes, while whites are elevated to honors and advanced placement. Protesting this kind of privilege - especially when it might be working to the advantage of one's own children - is the sort of thing we'll need to do if we hope to alter the system we swear we're against.

We'll have to stop moving from neighborhoods when "too many" people of color move in.

We'll have to stop running to private schools, or suburban public ones, and instead fight to make the schools serving all children in our community better. We'll need to consider taking advantage of the push for publicly funded charter schools by joining with parents of color to start institutions of our own, similar to the "Freedom Schools" established in Mississippi by the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee in 1964. These schools would teach not only traditional subject matter, but also the importance of critical thinking, and social and economic justice. If these are things we say we care about, we'll have to create those institutions ourselves.

And we must protest the privileging of elite, white male perspectives in school textbooks. We have to demand that the stories of all who have struggled to radically transform society be told: and if the existing texts don't do that, we must dip into our own pockets and pay for supplemental materials that teachers could use to make the classes they teach meaningful. And if we're in a position to make a hiring decision, we should go out of our way to recruit, identify and hire a person of color.

What these suggestions have in common - and they're hardly an exhaustive list - is that they require whites to leave the comfort zone to which we have grown accustomed. They require time, perhaps money, and above all else, courage, and they ask us to focus a little less on the relatively easy, though important, goal of "fixing" racism's victims (with a bit more money for this or that, or a little more affirmative action) and instead to pay attention to the need to challenge and change the perpetrators of and collaborators with the system of racial privilege. And those are the people we work with, live with, and wake up to every day. It's time to revoke the privileges of whiteness.

This article is adapted from an article that appeared in White Privilege: Essential Readings on the Other Side of Racism, ed. By Paula S. Rothenberg (New York: Worth Publishers, 2002). It originally ran as a ZNET commentary ( www.Zmag.org). Reprinted with permission.

Summer 2002

CONTENTS
Vol. 16, No. 4

Let Them Eat Tests

Vermont May Reject Federal Money

Not All Inequality Bothers Bush

Obituary: The Bilingual Education Act, 1968-2002

Does Bilingual Ed Work?

Israel, Palestine and Teaching: A Rethinking Schools Editorial

Resistance and Hope

Student Handout: Salt of the Earth

Philly Students Protest Edison

Another Urban Legend

Social Studies Standards for What?

Requesting Testing

'Write the Truth'

Jefferson and Slavery

Letter From Michelle to Harcourt

Response Letter from Harcourt

Researching Presidents and Slavery

Race, Testing, and the Miner's Canary

Confronting White Privilege

Why Talk about White Privilege?

Membership Has Its Privileges

A Deadly Diet

The Golden Arches Come to School

Corporate Curriculum

Math, SAT Tests, and Racial Profiling


Coming Your Way: Cyberschools


The Cyberspace 'Holy War'

Austin Says 'No' to Edison

Websites on Palestine and Israel

Many Thanks

Rethinking Schools Listserv

DEPARTMENTS

No Comment!

Shorts

Resources

Good Stuff

Letters

Student Page