A look at this Midwestern urban district shows both the promises and
challenges of sustaining a movement for multicultural, anti-racist education.
By Curtis Lawrence
Late last spring, about a dozen Milwaukee teenagers sat with areporter
to discuss multiculturalism and anti-racist education.The students were
from Riverside University High School, oftentouted as the district's
most multiracial and academically successful.But when they were asked
to assess multicultural and anti-racisteducation, their responses may
have stunned some familiar withthe district.
Despite several dedicated teachers, the students said multiculturalor
anti-racist education wasn't happening at Riverside.
"We don't get anything but a European aspect," said Benjamin
Engel,a native of Ghana, who last year was the president of Riverside'sStudent
Council.
Hannah Nolan-Spohn, a white student who last year was a sophomoreat
Riverside, also noted that contemporary issues - especiallythose about
race - don't get a lot of air-time. "In most classes,there are
not serious discussions about current events," Nolan-Spohnsaid.
"The teacher is more concerned about the lesson plan."
This is not what parents, administrators, teachers, and communityactivists
had in mind 10 years ago when they ignited a movementto infuse a multicultural
and anti-racist philosophy throughoutthe Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS).
In a unique step by a majorurban school district, MPS established districtwide
learning goals,the first of which stated that students would "project
anti-racist,anti-biased attitudes" and participate in a multicultural
curriculum.
The initiative was intended to go beyond what some teachers calla "food-facts
curriculum," a shallow overview of cultures anddiet that sometimes
passes for multicultural education. Instead,they wanted the Milwaukee
students to view their world with acritical multicultural eye - whether
through challenging a bookwhere Native Americans are stereotyped or
analyzing how AfricanAmericans and Latinos are portrayed on the nightly
news. The districtprovided funding, staffing, and a strong professional
developmentcomponent to implement its ambitious goals.
But due to a variety of factors - a changing political climate,shifts
in district leadership and vision, budget cuts, a movetoward decentralization,
and an increased emphasis on standardsand testing - Milwaukee's multicultural
movement has devolvedinto what can be described as "pockets of
multiculturalism." Theonce popular initiative is now kept alive
primarily by a smallgroup of teachers and administrators.
Milwaukee's decade of experimentation with multiculturalism providesa
case study of both the promises and challenges of providinga multicultural
curriculum in urban school districts.
Last April, teachers and administrators met at a forum on thetopic
sponsored by Rethinking Schools and hosted by the Helen Bader
Foundation, a Milwaukee-based organizationwith a strong interest in
education. Those attending were askedhow they thought multicultural
and anti-racist education had faredin Milwaukee in the previous three
to five years. Eleven answeredit had declined a lot, five said it had
declined a little or stayedthe same, and two responded it had improved
a little.
To understand how the teachers and staff arrived at their assessments,one
must first go to the roots of a movement many once hoped wouldput Milwaukee
permanently on the map as an innovator in multiculturaleducation.
THE WORLD WAS CHANGING
Part of what makes the Milwaukee experience noteworthy is thatthe push
for multicultural education came from both teachers andparents at the
grassroots level and from top administrators inthe district's central
office. Further, the school board supportedthe effort.
"We felt that as the world was changing, Milwaukee was changing,and
the school district was changing. We wanted to make sure ourchildren
weren't getting left behind in connection to the largersociety,"
said Joyce Mallory, a former school board member.
At the grassroots level, a key role was played by district-funded,teacher-led
councils, which allowed classroom teachers from acrossthe city to network
and share best practices. A particularly importantrole was played by
the Multicultural Curriculum Council, whichgrew out of an in-service
in January 1989 by Asa G. Hilliard III,a noted author on issues of race
and education, who is now a professorof urban education at Georgia State
University.
Although there is no one date that marks the beginning of themulticultural
movement in Milwaukee, many point to that in-serviceby Hilliard as a
key event. Then-Superintendent Robert Peterkinsupported the move for
multiculturalism and initiated two yearsof meetings and brainstorming
sessions by teachers, parents, administrators,and community leaders
on developing the district's curriculumgoals.
In the 1991-92 school year, the Milwaukee district adopted itsK-12
Teaching and Learning Initiatives. The first goal stated:"Students
will project anti-racist, anti-biased attitudes throughtheir participation
in a multilingual, multi-ethnic, culturallydiverse curriculum."
The significance of the K-12 Teaching and Learning Initiativeswent
beyond their content, however. For the first time, teachersfelt that
multiculturalism and anti-racist curriculum could bemore than just something
discussed in the hallways by small groupsof teachers. Now, it was a
policy developed with significant teacherand parent input and backed
by the district.
"It [the need for multicultural education] was broadly laid out,the
money was there and it was totally supported from the topdown,"
said Linda Kreft, a staff development specialist who runsthe MPS Resource
Center and who at the time was a classroom teacher."Because of
that, you had big support from the schools."
Cynthia Ellwood, then an English teacher at South Division HighSchool
recruited by the central administration to help implementthe K-12 learning
initiatives at a districtwide level, echoedthat view. "Everywhere
throughout the system there was a commitmentto multiculturalism, and
it came from the top," said Ellwood."There was a message out
there that I think is lacking these daysabout how important this was."
With backing from Deborah McGriff, deputy superintendent at thetime,
Ellwood used funding provided by the school board to providebooks and
other instructional materials as well as in-servicetraining and workshops
with experts in the field. She also broughta teacher's sensitivity to
her new position and insisted thatteachers remain in the driver's seat
so that the program wouldnot become another top-down initiative.
"I knew, as a teacher, that the answers were there among the teachers,"said
Ellwood, who is now principal of the Hartford UniversityAvenue School
for Urban Explorations. "They understood what itwould take better
than those in central office."
Kathy Swope, former co-chair of the Multicultural Curriculum Councilwho
now is the Performance Assessment Coordinator for MPS, saidthat the
"teacher-driven" component of the councils was crucialto effectively
infusing multiculturalism throughout the district."That was important
because of the ownership, the level of commitmentand the credibility
of the work that was done by the councils."
While the Multicultural Curriculum Council started with 12 to18 schools,
by 1995 the number of schools involved had jumpedto 100, or about two-thirds
of the district's schools. Councilmembers were responsible for attending
meetings and workshops,then returning to spread the word among other
teachers and staffat their schools. Goals of the council included training
its membersto be advocates for multicultural education, introducing
teachersto national consultants, and putting a variety of resources
intoteachers' hands.
In addition to the Multicultural Curriculum Council, the districthad
a number of other teacher-led councils, including the WholeLanguage
Council, Early Childhood Council, and Humanities Council.Most of the
councils also focused on providing staff developmentto promote multiculturalism.
DEFINING MULTICULTURALISM
One of the issues that immediately came to the fore was how todefine
multicultural education. "We were talking more about multiculturaleducation
and there were a lot of different views about what thatmeant,"
said Steven Baruch, a retired MPS administrator who workedfor the district's
human relations unit at the time.
Many on the Multicultural Curriculum Council argued for a perspectivethat
went beyond merely acknowledging the different cultures withinMPS. Kreft
said that "by and large we held the definition thatit was an education
and reform movement - a philosophical viewpointmeeting the needs of
students in a culturally diverse population."
Swope was especially concerned that issues of power and race beaddressed
directly. "Multicultural education is not just includingperspectives
and insights and information from various culturesor groups," said
Swope. "It's an ongoing process that empowersstudents to view the
world from multiple perspectives and to understandthe ongoing dynamics
of this rapidly changing world."
"The anti-racist component is included when you talk about empoweringstudents
to make changes in the world, to make critical judgmentsabout justice
and equity, and not to be complacent about the statusquo or about historical
omissions and distortions," Swope said.
There was also the concern that multiculturalism not be viewedin a
vacuum, but rather be seen as a thread running through allof the teacher-led
councils. The Humanities Council, for example,sponsored an in-service
session where teachers instructed theirpeers on innovative ways to teach
novels by non-white authors.
In 1994, MPS teachers and staff, working with the MulticulturalCurriculum
Council, wrote an implementation guide for multiculturaland anti-racist
education. The guide gave detailed steps on howto implement a multicultural
curriculum and examples of how toinvolve students in the concept.
"In addition to staff development, we were able to provide actualmaterials,"
Swope said. "If a school wanted to infuse more multiculturalisminto
their mathematics curriculum, for example, someone from thecouncil would
provide sample lessons, strategies, and specificresources to help with
that objective."
While the councils made an impact, even supporters of the initiativesay
it was far from perfect. Implementing the number-one goalof the K-12
initiative was no easy task.
"We felt that a lot of exciting things would happen and a lotof
them did," Baruch said. "But as far as systemic reform, maybewe
were trying to do too much in too many places."
Paulette Copeland, a 24-year-MPS veteran who now heads the MilwaukeeTeachers
Education Association, said the councils "were hopingthat every
school would put [multicultural, anti-racist curriculum]into their education
plan and actually promote it, but it didnot actually work. Schools wrote
it out, but it was just a plan.There were no checks to see if you were
actually carrying outyour plan."
A MASSIVE BLOW
In the spring of 1996, during the district's budget process, theK-12
curriculum councils took a major hit when their budgets wereeliminated.
"When the funding for the councils was no longer provided, thevehicle
that allowed teachers from across the district to cometogether and to
struggle with issues and to pool their knowledgewas no longer there,"
Swope said.
"It was really a massive blow to all of the councils and to theteachers,"
added Kreft. "We could no longer have funds for anything- no money
for speakers. And we no longer had funding to developany kind of publications."
Former Milwaukee School Board President Mary Bills said the districtwas
under intense pressure to reduce property taxes and to lookfor programs
to trim and cut. Although Bills had supported thecouncils, she felt
she had no choice but to vote in favor of thecuts. "I think it
was just easy pickings to be honest," Billssaid in a recent interview.
"It didn't have anything to do withthe merit."
At the same time, then-Superintendent Howard Fuller favored radicallydecentralizing
many districtwide supports and services. The Curriculumand Instruction
division at central office became a major targetof the budget cutters.
Council activities slowed dramaticallywhen funding was cut for basic
operating expenses, and for substitutes- who had made it possible for
teachers to leave their classroomsand participate in in-service programs.
Teachers who wanted tocontinue to participate in the councils had to
do so on theirown time.
Ellwood said the defunding "made a huge dent in the effect ofthe
council. It became a smaller group of people supporting acommon goal
as opposed to a group of leaders who had resourcesto spend in supporting
the whole district's agenda."
The Multicultural Curriculum Council continued meeting into 1998,Kreft
said. "But we really found it very difficult to get speakersbecause
everyone wanted a stipend and we had just more or lessrun out of steam."
Another contributing factor to the demise of the councils wasthe district's
emphasis on the School-To-Work program, an initiativewith strong support
from central office. Funds that once wentto the councils were directed
to School-to-Work training and in-servicesessions. Standards and testing
also were getting attention atthe local, state, and national levels.
"The emphasis changed over time and when people suddenly foundthat
multicultural and anti-racist education were no longer atcenter stage.
... There was a redefinition of what was the mostimportant goal,"
said Baruch. "Everybody was talking about thestandards, and the
emphasis was now on how to raise test scores.You could see it happening
and that's where the money startedto go and that's where the emphasis
went."
POCKETS OF MULTICULTURALISM
The assessment of multiculturalism by Riverside students is importantbecause
Riverside is described in the district's accountabilityreport as "one
of Milwaukee Public Schools' most successful highschools." It is
also known for its multiracial student body -the school is 50 percent
African Americans, 25 percent whites,15 percent Latinos, and 7 percent
Asians. Native Americans andthose defined as "other" account
for 3 percent.
When the students talked about the lack of emphasis on multiculturaland
anti-racist education at the school, one of the exceptionsthey mentioned
frequently was English teacher Ashanti Hamilton,a 27-year-old African
American teacher who is a Riverside alumnus.
Hamilton began the 1998-99 school year covering the routine curriculum-
authors such as Ernest Hemmingway, F. Scott Fitzgerald, andStephen Crane.
In the second half of the year, Hamilton decidedto take the curriculum
in another direction. "One of the firstthings we did was to have
a discussion about what racism was,how it manifested itself, and how
each of us has our own differentset of prejudices," he said.
Hamilton introduced the discussion by showing a 1993 episode fromthe
NBC news program, "Dateline NBC." The program, "True
Colors,"followed two men, one African-American and one white, and
chronicledtheir experiences trying to rent an apartment, purchase a
car,hail a taxi, and secure a hotel room. The program, which documentedthe
second-class treatment received by the African-American man,sparked
discussion and emotion among his students.
Included in discussions in the weeks after the video was shownwas talk
of lynches, the treatment of Native Americans, and thepersecution of
Jews and other people during Hitler's Holocaust.
Discussions also included the Asian and Hispanic experiences andwhat
it means to be bilingual in the United States. Hamilton alsomade sure
he included positive examples of white Americans includingabolitionists
and Milwaukee's own Father James Groppi, the lateCatholic priest and
civil rights activist.
For some of the students, the frank and open discussions wereoverwhelming,
Hamilton said. "It was heart- wrenching," Hamiltonsaid. "There
were tears and everything."
Some of the white students "started to feel a little uncomfortablebecause
they wanted to truly believe they were not like theirparents,"
Hamilton said. There was also an uncomfortable feelingamong some African-American
students who felt compelled to defendtheir white classmates during some
of the heated discussions.
Hamilton had braced himself for calls and visits from parents,and they
came.
"They complained that they didn't consider this traditional Americanliterature,"
he said. When he explained the concept of his classto Riverside Principal
Mary Ann Zapala, "she said 'fine,'" Hamiltonrecalled and that
she gave him her full support.
Contrary to what some parents thought, Hamilton saw multiculturaland
anti-racist education as a crucial part of the skills hisstudents would
need to succeed in life and not at all out of linewith his responsibility
as an English teacher. "One of the majorpurposes of literature,
of language, of writing - everything thisclass is supposed to be about
- is to cross barriers," Hamiltonsaid. "I felt like I would
have done my white students a disserviceif I didn't put a mirror up
to them. I would have done a disserviceto my ethnic, minority students
if I did not validate their Americanexperience. And I would have really
done myself a disservice ifI didn't teach them from a personal perspective."
Chuck Cooney, a Riverside history teacher and a 22-year MPS veteran,says
Hamilton will be sorely missed this school year. Hamiltonhas decided
to pursue a law degree and will not return to Riverside.
Cooney is another example of how teachers have been able to interjectmulticultural,
anti-racist material into the curriculum despitea decrease in the emphasis
on multiculturalism from central office.
In the early 1990s, for instance, Cooney taught his students aboutthe
Fugitive Slave Act. Included in the lesson was the story ofSherman M.
Booth, a Wisconsin abolitionist who organized a contingentof 5,000 abolitionists
to rescue an escaped slave named JoshuaGlover from a Milwaukee jail.
Booth was arrested and jailed several times for violating theFugitive
Slave Act. President James Buchanan finally pardonedhim in 1861, and
a Milwaukee street was named in his honor.
Cooney recalls telling one of his classes the story. "This kid,I
don't remember his name, raises his hand and says, 'Why isn'tthere a
street named after that slave dude?' I never thought ofthat question,"
Cooney said.
Cooney, though, continued to raise the same question with hisstudents
every year and in 1994, one of his classes mounted asuccessful campaign
to rename a Milwaukee street after Glover.
But teachers can't be expected to interject such projects intothe curriculum
without training or without encouragement fromthe administration, Cooney
said. "They won't just do it unlessthey're prodded."
Cooney cited two other barriers to multicultural education. "Alot
more of this kind of teaching would happen if teachers wouldhave the
chance during the day to talk to one another," he said.And like
many other teachers throughout the district, Cooney citesthe pressure
on teachers to improve test scores. "I've never feltas much pressure
to teach to a test as I have in the last fiveyears."
The pressures of testing and little time for preparation and developingnew
curriculum are also felt at the middle school and elementarylevels,
according to Milwaukee teachers.
Brenda Harvey came to Milwaukee five years ago and worked as afifth-grade
teacher at Hartford and, most recently, as an administratorat Garden
Homes Elementary.
"I came here from Raleigh, N.C., and I was really impressed withthe
number-one teaching goal," said Harvey referring to the statedemphasis
on a multilingual, multi-ethnic, culturally diverse curriculum."I
came here with a lot of high hopes."
Harvey said she never thought the interjection of race and cultureinto
her classroom was at conflict with her duty to prepare herstudents academically.
"Certainly, I expected them to know mathand the scientific processÉ,"
Harvey said. "I also expected themto know what it means to be a
functioning, educated person inan urban setting."
"Both as a teacher and as an administrator, I believe in demandingexcellence,"
Harvey said. "I don't have a problem with the useof standards to
achieve excellence. But when we look at most ofthe standards, we find
that they are reflective of a narrow, white,mono-ethnic perspective.
The standards that are used in most casesare not indicators of meaningful
learning."
At issue, Harvey said, is the degree of force with which standardsare
being pushed to the forefront at the expense of multiculturalism."The
passion is placed into standards and accountability," shesaid adding
that during her last year at Hartford, she felt "thestandards piece
breathing down my back the most."
School Board President Bruce Thompson, first elected in April1997,
said until he sees actual proof that a multicultural curriculumhelps
prepare students academically, he will continue the emphasison standards,
accountability, and testing.
"I haven't seen any examination of how effective it is,"
Thompsonsaid, adding that he is concerned that such an emphasis "can
takeaway from the kind of skills students will need to succeed inmainstream
society." He also voiced concern that students would"get shortchanged
on literature that's part of our overall culture."
Thompson said it's hard to have candid discussions about racefor fear
of "saying the wrong things. The problem is that thereare so many
dangers of talking about it. It's very hard to [ask],'Why do we have
this performance gap?'"
RACE IS CRUCIAL
But no matter how painful, it's critical that race be talked aboutrather
than ignored, said Mallory, the former school board memberwho is now
the director of Start Smart, an organization that focuseson promoting
awareness around early childhood issues.
"If adults don't talk about race in Milwaukee, how can we createa
community where everyone is valued?" asked Mallory.
"To think that doing well on a test is all the skills young peopleare
going to need is foolhardy," she said. "If you look at oneof
the primary skills employers want people to have, it's theability to
get along with people from different backgrounds anddifferent orientations."
Mallory said that the school board she served on did not wantmulticultural
and anti-racist education to come at the expenseof the rest of the curriculum.
But rather it was to be woven into bolster the rigor of what was being
taught.
"I didn't see it as fluff then, and I don't see it as fluff now,"said
Mallory. "Personally if I had a child in the MPS today, Iwould
still see it as important, particularly for children ofcolor. Racism
and all those other 'isms' haven't gone away."
Fall 2000
|