|
Following are some of the most common criticisms of
the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS), used in elementary school, and
the Tests of Achievement and Proficiency (TAP), used in high school.
- ITBS/TAP scores do not tell what students know or
are able to do. They only tell how a child compares to other students.
The ITBS/TAP are what are called "norm-referenced tests." This
means they are designed to sort and rank students on a bell-shaped
curve -- in which only a few students score very high, only a few
score very low, and most score in the middle. The tests are also
designed so that half the students taking the test will end up below
average, and half above average. This guarantees that half of the
students will always score "below average" on such tests.
- ITBS/TAP tests use obscure or tricky questions.
If the driver's test were used to sort or rank people, it would
have to include some questions not everyone would get right. In
such a case, it might ask, "How do you get from Union Station to
O'Hare Airport?" or, "What is the chemical composition of diesel
fuel?"
ITBS/TAP tests also include some questions which are designed to
sort out kids.
A close look at these kinds of questions shows that they may have
more than one answer which many people would consider correct. For
example, look at the following question:
Choose the word that best completes this sentence - A sage individual
is:_ touchy _ testy _ old _ wise.
The test maker says the right answer is "wise." This kind of question
could trip up many students, including those from cultures strongly
identifying wisdom with age.
- The margin of error of ITBS/TAP test results is too great
to use those results alone to make important educational decisions.
Test scores are an estimate; they are not exact. This margin of error
is one reason that the Riverside Publishing Company tells school districts
not to use the ITBS/TAP test scores as a single basis for making decisions
like grade retention. Otherwise, one wrong answer on the tests can make
the difference in whether a child is promoted or retained. Despite these
cautions, the Chicago Public Schools uses these standardized tests to
make decisions about promotion.
Experts agree that other information, including teacher and parent
input, must be considered when making an important decision such as
retaining a student.
This information is adapted from an informational brochure published
by the Local School Councils Summit in conjunction with the testing
reform group FairTest. The LSC is a coalition of Chicago parent and
school reform groups including the Chicago Association of Local School
Councils, Designs for Change, PURE, Teachers' Task Force, Cross-City
Campaign for Urban School Reform, Schools First, and the Lawyers' School
Reform Advisory Project.
Spring 1999
|
CONTENTS
Vol. 13, No. 3
Why the Testing Craze Won't Fix Our Schools
Alternatives to Standardized Tests
Tests from Hell
Testing Against Democracy
Appropriate Use of Tests
Hallmarks of Good Assessment
Standards and the Control of Knowledge
The Forgotten History of Eugenics
Limitations of the ITBS
Dancin' Circles
The Straitjacket of Standardized Tests
Monkeys, Pouches, and Reading
How Many Must Die?
Promiment Voices on Iraq
More Information on Iraq
The Influential E. D. Hirsch
No Comment!
Ed-Web
|