|
Alternatives to high-stakes, standardized tests are being implemented
across the country. While the alternatives vary in focus and scope,
they generally share the following principles:
- Support improved learning. The assessment is designed to provide
feedback that helps students improve their learning.
- Help teachers teach better. Good assessment provides an array of
information that teachers can use to improve their teaching practices
and help ensure student learning.
- Are integrated with the curriculum and instruction. Assessment works
best when it flows naturally from, and is part of, student work --
i.e., a science experiment that becomes part of the student portfolio.
- Are classroom based. Most of the information for the assessment
is based on classroom work done by students over a period of time.
- Use a variety of measures. Good assessment does not rely on a single
yardstick but compiles data based on both individual students' learning
plus schoolwide data such as attendance and graduation rates.
- Involve educators, parents, and the broader community. Improved
success for students relies on a positive collaboration among the
various forces necessary for school reform to work.
- Don't straitjacket the curriculum. Good assessment procedures provide
for flexibility and don't dominate the curriculum.
Spring 1999
|
CONTENTS
Vol. 13, No. 3
Why the Testing Craze Won't Fix Our Schools
Alternatives to Standardized Tests
Tests from Hell
Testing Against Democracy
Appropriate Use of Tests
Hallmarks of Good Assessment
Standards and the Control of Knowledge
The Forgotten History of Eugenics
Limitations of the ITBS
Dancin' Circles
The Straitjacket of Standardized Tests
Monkeys, Pouches, and Reading
How Many Must Die?
Promiment Voices on Iraq
More Information on Iraq
The Influential E. D. Hirsch
No Comment!
Ed-Web
|